“From the beginning, the investment was really into our communities and in a unique way, which is across sectors… It really broke our silos and opened them up across our community… So I think what Invest Health has done has really opened up the opportunity to build and bring social determinants of health to light within our community.” – Invest Health city team member
Invest Health, an initiative managed by Reinvestment Fund and supported by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF), launched in 2016 with a vision to engage 50 small and midsize cities over 18 months to improve health equity through community development system change and investments in the built environment. After its initial phase, Invest Health continued through three additional iterations. The duration of the initiative and the consistent engagement of many of the original stakeholders in the 50 cities distinguish Invest Health in the field and provide a unique opportunity for learning. Mt. Auburn Associates, the long-term learning partner of Invest Health, completed the final evaluation at the end of 2024.
Hundreds of stakeholders in Invest Health’s 50 cities have not only informed the shared learning, but have shaped the initiative over time and realized impressive outcomes at home. At Mt. Auburn, we are grateful to learn alongside them and are eager to share back with the Invest Health city teams who shared their experiences and insights as part of this research.
This blog highlights key takeaways from the final evaluation that can help cities sustain and expand their progress and build new strategies around community development and health.
Five Key Findings for Small and Midsize Cities
1. Nurture broad, cross-sector relationships to create sustainable networks
Cities that engaged a broad set of aligned partners built enduring relationships that continue their collaborative work. The Invest Health cities show that broad, informal networks where there are deep relationships and aligned priorities can impact significant outcomes even without a formal “team” advancing collaborative work.
2. Align with existing collaborative efforts to maximize impact
Cities that aligned Invest Health efforts with other collaboratives or coalitions achieved more substantial, scalable results. When embarking on collaborative work, take the time to map the existing collaborative efforts in your city to find opportunities to align and build on existing efforts, maximize limited resources, and secure buy-in from key leaders.
3. Engage anchor institutions to strengthen community development capacity
Invest Health teams that secured the commitment of their local healthcare institution or university benefited from the anchor organization’s capacity and influential role in their communities. In some cases, Invest Health teams influenced these organizations to adopt new practices or step into a stronger anchor role in their city. Anchor institutions vary in their commitment to health equity and the built environment. However, when possible, engaging key leaders of anchor organizations can amplify the impacts of collaborative efforts.
Example: In Grand Rapids, MI, a core leader of the Invest Health work helped start a community land trust with significant financial support from its hospital partner, Corewell Health (previously Spectrum Health).
4. Build community development finance capacity to advance built environment projects
Particularly in small cities, building the capacity of existing organizations, such as community development corporations (CDCs), other mission-oriented developers, and community development financial institutions (CDFIs), and attracting the attention of national actors, is critical for accomplishing built environment outcomes. Some Invest Health cities were able to influence their local community investment systems in these ways, or through other efforts such as creating capital funds and amending zoning codes.
5. Maintain Cross-City Relationships to Foster Learning and Innovation
Invest Health created a platform for cross-city relationships where stakeholders collaborated to solve complex problems in implementing new projects, programs, or policies. The great value of the Invest Health network highlights the importance of sustaining these relationships as the 50 cities continue to advance health equity in an evolving context. Small and midsize cities without access to a cross-city network may benefit from supporting public sector staff and other leaders in attending conferences or webinars or identifying other ways to tap into existing networks focused on small and midsize cities.
Example: The Henderson, NV, and Iowa City, IA, Invest Health teams advanced zoning changes to encourage greater housing options in their cities based on learning from a collaborative trip to Fort Collins, CO. The teams focused their learning agenda on zoning changes that could facilitate the transition of downtowns from single-family neighborhoods by including duplexes, townhomes, and smaller-scale residential developments, often referred to as “missing middle” housing.
This experience encouraged Henderson to add minimum housing type requirements to its zoning code to strengthen the city’s ability to increase housing choice. Similarly, Iowa City already had proposals in place but faced political opposition. Members of this team brought home pictures of the diverse housing options in Fort Collins to share with the planning and zoning department and with other key stakeholders in the public review process, which helped change stakeholders’ perspectives and gather support for the proposal.
Conclusion
Documenting the growth, learning, and meaningful progress with the 50 Invest Health cities has been an enriching experience. Mt. Auburn Associates would like to thank each contributor to the learning and evaluation process and encourage others interested in advancing community development work through a health equity mindset to dive into the four reports that document the deep impact Invest Health has achieved across the country.